In the past few posts we have been checking various aspects related to bit fields. In this blog, let we focus on how bit-lengths will pose a serious issue to achieve portability in case of bit-fields structures.

Portability is basically about having the same program or application running across various processor architecture. When it comes to embedded systems portability plays a very important role as they have diversified set of hardware. 


To start with, let us take a simple program as given below in Fig 1:

After running the above code, output is shown in the given below Fig 2:

Note: source code is tested under gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 4.7.2 version.

From the above figure 2, it is clear that when we declare the bit-length more than the sizeof(int)[ In our case , it is 4 bytes] , which is compiler dependent we are getting the error at the compile time. The above code perfectly works fine , if the machine WORD size is 64 bits, but fails to work with lower WORD size, which results in portability issue.

Pointers & Bit-fields

I want to focus on one more problem, why pointers cannot be applied for the bit-fields.let me practically explain this problem by taking an example shown in the fig 3 below,

The output of the above source code is given below,

One can observe from the above fig 4, when triedto reference the bit-field structure variable, compiler is generating an error, this is because direct addressing of the bit-fields structure variables is not possible in C, since the smallest unit of addressable memory in C is a sizeof(char)i.e byte addressable not an bit addressable.This is one of the pit-fall of the bit-field structure in C programming.

From the above two examples, we can conclude that how portability issue is major concern with the bit-fields, and also we saw direct addressing of the bit-fields is not possible in C programming. Apart from this two issues, even sizeof() operator cannot also be applied for the bit-fields since sizeof alwaysreturns size in bytes not in terms of bits. Use bit-wise operators instead, they are 100% safe and portable.